<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://innersurfaces.com/2026/09/24/william-blakes-hecate-image-symbol-and-ambiguity/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Inner Surfaces</news:name><news:language>en-gb</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-09-24T10:07:01+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>William Blake’s Hecate: Image, Symbol and Ambiguity</news:title><news:keywords>Romanticism, Symbolism, British art, Medea, Enitharmon, large colour prints, Christopher Heppner, Shakespeare, Macbeth, mythology, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, William Blake, S. Foster Damon, Vegetative Existence, The Night of Enitharmon’s Joy, Romantic art, printmaking, Anthony Blunt, Martin Butlin, Urizen, Hecate</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://innersurfaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/blake-tate-separate.jpg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>